Arbitration request by the Philippines against China over the South
China Sea would hit nowhere with false assumptions and the UN tribunal
has actually no jurisdiction over some of the requests, said European
experts.
None of the 13 points of the request by the Philippines either gives rise to a dispute concerning the interpretation or application of the Law of the Sea convention (UNCLOS, or the Convention) or can be addressed without considering matters which are or have been validly removed from the jurisdiction of the tribunal, according to Stephan Talmon, co-director of the Institute of Public International Law at the University of Bonn.
That is excluded by the Chinese declaration under article 298 of Law of the Convention, said Oude Elferink.
As to the "nine-dash line" (also known as dotted-line), be it in historical claim or a maritime boundary claim, Oude Elferink also believed that the tribunal can not say anything about it since the tribunal does not have jurisdiction to deal with historic title or delimitation in this case.
"I do not think that's really the interest of the Philippines. I would suspect that they do not expect all of their claim will be awarded," said Oude Elferink.
Xinhua - globaltimes.cn
17/8/15
--
-
Related:
None of the 13 points of the request by the Philippines either gives rise to a dispute concerning the interpretation or application of the Law of the Sea convention (UNCLOS, or the Convention) or can be addressed without considering matters which are or have been validly removed from the jurisdiction of the tribunal, according to Stephan Talmon, co-director of the Institute of Public International Law at the University of Bonn.
- In fact, sovereignty disputes are beyond the scope of the UNCLOS as they do not concern the interpretation or application of the Convention.
- Based on these facts, in its Position Paper issued last December the Chinese government argued that the tribunal has no jurisdiction on any of the Philippines' claims.
That is excluded by the Chinese declaration under article 298 of Law of the Convention, said Oude Elferink.
As to the "nine-dash line" (also known as dotted-line), be it in historical claim or a maritime boundary claim, Oude Elferink also believed that the tribunal can not say anything about it since the tribunal does not have jurisdiction to deal with historic title or delimitation in this case.
"I do not think that's really the interest of the Philippines. I would suspect that they do not expect all of their claim will be awarded," said Oude Elferink.
Xinhua - globaltimes.cn
17/8/15
--
-
Related:
China won't accept Hague sovereignty arbitration
China urges Philippines to return to bilateral talks on disputed sea...
--
Beijing rejects arbitration tribunal South China Sea ruling
China: Philippines' resort to UN tribunal complicates South China Sea issues
Στη Διαιτησία του ΟΗΕ Θέλουν να Προσφύγουν οι Φιλιππίνες για τη Διαμάχη με την Κίνα
China dismisses Aquino's remarks on sea disputes as ridiculous, unreasonable
China opposes Manila's plans of building bases for US ships in South China Sea
No comments:
Post a Comment
Only News